You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
View Poll Results: Is the decision right to move to next year?
Yes
0
0%
No
4
80.00%
Need for information as too why some teams are for and some against
Champions Trophy
Champions Trophy postponed until October 2009
Cricinfo staff
August 24, 2008
The ICC has postponed the Champions Trophy, which was due to begin in Pakistan in 19 days' time, to October 2009, after five of the eight participating nations confirmed during a teleconference on Sunday that they would not send their teams for the event due to security concerns. South Africa had on Saturday pulled out of the tournament, which was originally scheduled to be held from Sept 12-28 in Karachi and Lahore, and the ICC was informed on Sunday that Australia, England, New Zealand and West Indies, too, would not be participating.
The ICC will now meet in September to finalise a window for the tournament in 2009 and, while Pakistan will be given "first preference" to host it, a decision on the venue may be taken only after a security assessment of the country is done around February, after the India tour.
Sources who attended the ICC's teleconference said there was the option of the tournament being relocated to Sri Lanka, the official alternate venue, but India and Pakistan remained adamant against a change.
India, the sources said, were not willing to sacrifice Pakistan. The Sri Lankans too didn't press their case, as they supported the Pakistan view that a venue change could not be made on security grounds. The meeting was held in an amicable atmosphere because most of the issues had been thrashed out among the members beforehand, rendering the final discussions a mere formality.
"There was unanimity in the decision to postpone the event until October next year," David Morgan, the ICC president, told Sky Sports. "India is very influential but so is Giles Clarke (ECB chief executive), Australia, New Zealand - they all bring their influence to bear.
"The vote was totally in favour of the postponement until October next year. And India were quite influential in persuading some other nations that that was the right course of action."
The ICC have appeased Pakistan, at least for the time being, in choosing not to cancel the competition entirely but postponing it until October next year. Morgan, though, was insistent that "appeasement was not part of the meeting at all".
"The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) have been extremely reasonable about the whole subject, (it has been very clear) they have worked jolly hard to try to give comfort to the member boards, and the eight teams that are touring, that it would be safe and secure," Morgan said. "Unfortunately, five of the participating nations found it impossible to send their team to Pakistan because of safety concerns."
Though the postponement means there will be a rare 33 days without international cricket this year, the schedule for 2009 promises to be every bit as packed - besides, the next edition of the Champions Trophy is coming up in 2010. "Every cricketing year is a busy one," Morgan said. "We're more aware of it in the UK because of the Ashes, the World Twenty20 and the one-day series against Australia, but it is no busier a year than any other.
"There will certainly be more security assessments. We're going to meet around the table in 3 or 4 weeks in Dubai to discuss the mechanisms of the postponement. There are numerous things to be discussed and we're planning on meeting in the middle of September to discuss the consequences of the decision."
Haroon Lorgat, the ICC chief executive, added: "Every one of our members wishes to ensure the ICC Champions Trophy is a world-class event and the prospect of relocating it at short notice in order to make sure it was played this year would not allow that criterion to be fulfilled."
Shafqat Naghmi, the PCB's chief operating officer, said that postponing the tournament was the only option in light of boycott threats. "Cricket is not going to die here, it's just that we are going through a difficult phase," Naghmi said. "We would have lost the hosting rights had the Champions Trophy been relocated [to Sri Lanka].
"With four of the eight teams threatening to pull out, "it made little sense to organize a four-team competition," he said.
Giles Clarke, the chairman of the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), said his board supported the ICC decision and had last week "explained their reservations and security concerns about staging the tournament in the aftermath of the resignation of the Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf last Monday."
Before you vote let me tell you that if the champions trophy would have moved to some other place than ICC would had have to pay millions of dollar to media and broadcasting company.. But that thing only comes into play if they change the venue....
My vote is for " need more information" as to why is india and srilanka supporting pakistan and why are aus nz sa eng not supporting... reading the source it looks like india and sri lanka were intensely supporting pak why???
Definitely the tour should have stayed to pak and should have been this year*
India not SL is supporting pak cuz of WC 2011 which is to be held in SL, BD, Ind and Pak. In 1996 WC teams refused to play in SL due to security reasons, and the semifinal at Kolkata where SL beat Ind brought riots. Since security situation in SL, Pak and Ind more or less same (obviously currently worst in Pak) same arguments can be made when WC comes ariound. Moving CT or cancelling it would have set precedent and conceivably open the gate to move the WC if situation wasn't satisfactory for Eng, NZ, AUS and SA or any other countries.
When SL was bycotted by Aus and WI, Ind and Pak sent thier joint teams to show solidarity with Asian country to play a frindly match. Both Ind and Pak visisted SL amid high security problems, esp India since they were the prime target as manifested by thier army's presence in 80's in SL and subsequent assasination of Rajiv Gandhi by Tamil terrorists. It is also worthy of noting Rajiv Gandhi was attacked while getting a guard of honor in SL by a SL army personal, despite all that Ind kept touring SL. Same incidents can be mentioned btween Ind and Pak, eg the direct threat to Pak team during 2004-05 tour of Ind by shiv sehna and the pitch incident. Yet Pak kept the tours of Ind.
So all teams are looking after each other due to thier own vested interests noone doing anyone favors lolz. Asian block sticking together to save thier own collective asses.
Personally i think PCB should have convinced Ind to have CT move to SL, which helps with WC and save the tournament.
1 - CT still in Asia and in a country which has civil war raging, teams come to play then can't complain of security situation.
2 - Iron clad guarantees of no more drama at WC time.
I feel sorry for the Pakistan cricket public. But this decision was inevitable. It isn't safe. In particular, Australian and England teams would be targeted as their countries fought in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not to mention Musharraf stepping down.
Omar Samuhiddin at cricinfo is livid with the ICC but he is blinded by his national pride.
Yeah moving it to Sri Lanka as was mooted would have meant other problems. Money, jealousy, etc. But mainly money.
I wonder if postponing it for a year means anything. I doubt it will go ahead next year.
Champions Trophy postponed until October 2009
Linear Mode
